Usually, tokenization is a relatively expensive process. This is why tokenizing small objects worth $50 000 or $100 000 isn’t that cost-effective. On the other hand, it makes sense to place all such projects on a single tokenization platform to ensure investors’ flow. It enables the issuer to reduce the price per object up to the level when it becomes cost-effective.
For instance, at the moment of writing this article, the most recent RealT case of property tokenization managed to raise $148,890, and there are multiple other successful cases with similar or even much smaller checks. The offering was provided for the house located at 5846 Crane St, Detroit, and its potential investment return constituted 11.73%
eziStake acts as a similar platform to RealT, by allowing smaller investors to tokenise and fractionalise their assets, and market them within our platform and ecosystem, and unlike RealT we are locally owned and operated within Australia.
Source: https://blog.stobox.io/tokenization-of-real-estate-case-studies
